| Free (personal use) | Premium starter (Free Beta) | Austlii | Court Data Australia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
upon registration AUD$ 0 per/mo |
requires business or student email account - bigger limits and more access provided. AUD$ 0 RECOMMENDED |
AUD$ 0 per/mo |
AUD$ 45 per/mo |
|
| Free inclusions: Court List | ||||
| Email sign-up type Can I sign up with my gmail or hotmail account or do I require my business email address to unlock additional limits? |
||||
| Access Level Unlock Professional Limits. Requires a verified company / business email, government, university or similar for expanded search volume. |
N/A | |||
| Social sign-in For added security - sign-in with Microsoft, Google. |
N/A | |||
| Single sign-on (SSO) Enterprise level security |
N/A | |||
| Basic case search Instant search, self-service. Includes: Case Name, Parties, Add to Watchlist button*, Jurisdiction, Court Name, Court Address, Court Location, Court Room Number, Judicial Officer's name, Case Type. * Some features require paid subscription / unlocking. |
||||
| Limit - Daily search per calendar day, Sydney time. |
||||
| Search cases since 2017 Civil case primarily within the NSW and Federal Court systems. NB: lawlink.nsw.gov.au searches typically only list cases over the last seven (7) days ... see https://www.dcpartners.solutions/cases |
||||
| Limit - Daily search per calendar day, Sydney time. |
||||
| Links to profile of each of the litigation parties E.g. Applicant / Plaintiff v Respondent / Defendant via dcpartners.solutions/profile/* |
||||
| Limit - Daily search per calendar day, Sydney time. |
||||
| Links to profiles other court cases NSW (Civil and NCAT) and Federal Court jurisdictions. |
||||
| Limit - Daily search per calendar day, Sydney time. |
||||
| Links to profiles known (or most recent) contact details. We provide a link to further research know information on a profile such as: ABN, address, contact details, LinkedIn profile, staff numbers, industry segments and more. Watch for further beta features to roll out in early 2026. |
||||
| Links to Case Law / Judicial decisions Judgments provided via Watchlist / Case alerts to registered free subscribers. |
||||
| Links to the relevant legislation Approximately 9000 legislative instruments, 1000 legal definitions, 4000+ legal precedents and more available via https://dcpartners.solutions/learning-centre ... ask Digital Mark J Smith chatbot any question, he's trained on them all. |
||||
| AI Legal Consultant/Chatbot 24x7 multi-lingual chatbot trained on all Mark J Smith's legal knowledge, case law / precedents, Australian legislation and more. Limits apply. |
||||
| Digital Mark J Smith answer re Case Law / Judicial decisions 24x7 multi-lingual chatbot trained on all Mark J Smith's legal knowledge, case law / precedents, Australian legislation and more. Limits apply. |
||||
| Digital Mark J Smith answers re relevant legislation 24x7 multi-lingual chatbot trained on all Mark J Smith's legal knowledge, case law / precedents, Australian legislation and more. Limits apply. |
||||
| Digital Mark J Smith Legal Reference Answers 24x7 multi-lingual chatbot trained on all Mark J Smith's legal knowledge, case law / precedents, Australian legislation and more. Limits apply. |
||||
| Watchlist (and Case alerts) follow a case, litigant (either or both) of your choosing (via the Add to Watchlist button) and be notified of future events. Limits apply, still in Alpha. Register for beta access upon release. |
||||
| Watchlist upload via csv follow a case, litigant (either or both) of your choosing (via the Add to Watchlist button) and be notified of future events. Limits apply, |
||||
| LIS Score Score only - no qualitative or explanatory analysis. NB: This service currently in Alpha with invited users expected to receive their invites and soft launch in late December 2025 or early January 2026. The Beta phase of this product will be announced on our Product Road Map page in early 2026. |
||||
| LIS Factor Breakdown (The 'Why') Here we show you all the breakdown and scoring (risk) factors behind the score. Score only - no qualitative or explanatory analysis. NB: This service currently in Alpha with invited users expected to receive their invites and soft launch in late December 2025 or early January 2026. The Beta phase of this product will be announced on our Product Road Map page in early 2026. |
||||
| Upgrade anytime - no lock in contract Upgrade, downgrade or trial anytime, no questions asked. Absolute control and freedom for you. All agreements are month to month only. |
N/A | |||
| First hearing date included in free-search |
||||
| Last hearing date available via Watchlist |
||||
| Next hearing date available via Watchlist |
||||
| Case outcome / judgment available via Watchlist |
||||
| Advanced search - Court hearing date/s Here we give you access to a list of all known court mentions including hearings back to 2017. |
||||
| Advanced search - Listing Type Here we give you access to a list of the listing type for each of the relevant court mentions including hearings back to 2017, e.g. directions hearing, mentions, conciliation, examination, decisions, etc. |
||||
| Advanced search - Court hearing date/s Here we give you access to a list of all known court mentions including hearings back to 2017. |
||||
| Customer portal access via dcpartners.solutions/portal .... view full watchlist (in Beta), user settings, log tickets, view plan information (upgrade or downgrade at any time) and more. This feature is in alpha. Register for beta access. NB: View paid plans for further information. |
||||
| Corporate account / Company wide search visibility Accessible to corporate account administrators via portal feature. Administrator can opt to track what others in your organisation are tracking - free or paid? |
||||
| Internal Conflict Management (Chinese Walls) Accessible to corporate account administrators via portal feature. Administrator can opt to prevent others in your organisation knowing the cases or litigants you are following? |
||||
| Provider-Blind Mode Accessible to corporate account administrators via portal feature. Administrator can opt to anonymize your searches so that not even courtlist.com.au knows what you're searching? |
||||
| Graphical relationship/s view Data is presented graphically to view all 'nodes' - e.g. all cases that a litigant is involved in, all parties against whom a party is suing, all that 3rd parties other cases, all presiding officers sitting on cases, all dates of all hearings, all case types, all hearing types, etc. This is an alpha feature and will be released in 2026. Register for beta access. |
||||
| Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) separate access for corporate Privacy Officer/Auditor Roles |
||||
| Corrections If there is information that we've published that you believe is incorrect, you can always 'update' or correct that information, free .... email: corrections@courtlist.com.au |
||||
| Update case statuses We update about 247,258* case status so you don't have to. But, if we've missed something, you're able to send us an update which we'll incorporate if it appears that status is correct. * Case count as at 15/12/2025. |
||||
| Profile updates - Add a photo or logo - to a litigant profile A photo can be helpful to subscribers to identify for instance which 'Mark Smith' it is that is the subject of litigation or in the corresponding profile. |
||||
| Profile updates - Add a social link A social link can be helpful to subscribers to identify for instance which 'Mark Smith' it is that is the subject of litigation or in the corresponding profile. |
||||
| Profile updates - Add an employer An employer can be helpful to subscribers to identify for instance which 'Mark Smith' it is that is the subject of litigation or in the corresponding profile. |
||||
| Profile updates - Add a job description A job description can be helpful to subscribers to identify for instance which 'Mark Smith' it is that is the subject of litigation or in the corresponding profile. |
||||
| Profile updates - Add contact details Contact details can be helpful to subscribers to identify for instance which 'Mark Smith' it is that is the subject of litigation or in the corresponding profile. |
||||
| Story telling (bespoke pricing) | ||||
| Litigant research Where you're story is complex, our associate markjsmith.com can undertake world class research with a view to potential story telling |
||||
| Story telling Our associate and founder markjsmith.com may be willing to help you to tell your story. If you have a story, go to https://www.markjsmith.com/got-a-story |
||||
| Litigation funding | ||||
| Introductory service We will, if we believe in your case, introduce you to an appropriate 3rd party to, if necessary, help you to prosecute your case and achieve a suitable financial outcome. |
||||
| Other services | ||||
| Refinancing introductory services We can introduce you to our panel of non-vanilla business lenders. |
||||
| Cash flow or Insolvency - introductory service If you're business is experiencing hardship or cash flow interruptions, we can introduce you to our panel of non-vanilla cash flow lenders or for those concerned with solvency we offer a judgment free insolvency introduction service. |
||||
| Section Title | ||||
| Follows Civil Cases? | ||||
| Case coverage - Civil As at 30/12/2025 |
||||
| Follows Criminal Cases? | ||||
| Case coverage - Criminal As at 30/12/2025 |
||||
| Case type details / offense details | ||||
| Current or ex-partners Civil court records can sometimes be a great resource for identifying possible spouses or partners. Both persons can sometimes be listed in a civil action whether they are the ones taking the action against another person/entity or the ones against whom the action is being brought. Family law courts will mostly identify both persons involved in a matter. Note: searches should be done using a surname followed by the first initial of the given name in the Company Search section. |
||||
| Alias names To help identify any alias, AKA or maiden names. |
||||
| Deceased persons Access to official Births, Deaths and Marriage records are, for the most part, highly restricted in Australia. Therefore, identifying whether someone is now deceased can mean accessing and searching multiple cemetery and other similar sites. The civil court records component of the database can assist as deceased estate court matters and inquests are regularly included. |
||||
| Probate searches | ||||
| Location searches Further assistance is provided by pin-pointing people at a specific location on a particular day. If you've been looking for someone in one state and find a person with the same name has recently appeared before the courts in a different state, then a change of focus is possibly worthwhile. If a potential multi-day trial matter is identified, you will also known where that person is likely going to be on the following day. |
||||
| Employment The civil records include some Industrial Relations Commission daily court lists for some states and the Federal Court of Australia. Whilst not definitive, it can often provide a further lead to assist in determining a person's employer. In addition, as all persons involved in a court matter are searchable (as per the Case Title), this can often identify other persons acting on behalf of the applicant. |
||||
| Background Checks - for personal or business reasons A database is a must-have resource for any investigator providing background check services on a person or business, or for anyone conducting any kind of personal or professional research. The extent of the information available cannot be obtained elsewhere. As an individual, you might want to find out a little more about that new person in your life or even an old boyfriend/girlfriend. Or, if you are thinking of using a business or a trades person or renting your house to a person. A quick search can sometimes prove worthwhile over and above online reviews. |
||||
| Additional lines of inquiry A court case listing will often identify other persons involved in the matter. For example, a NSW Apprehended Violence Application will (most times) also identify the name of the person lodging the AV Application. Matters can also often identify police, legal representatives and other persons acting on behalf of the applicant. Civil court case listings usually show both the name of the person or organisation lodging the action as well as the person/organisation against whom the action is lodged. |
||||
| States covered - NSW | ||||
| States covered - QLD | ||||
| States covered - VIC | ||||
| States covered - SA | ||||
| States covered - WA | ||||
| States covered - TAS | ||||
| States covered - NT | ||||
| States covered - ACT | ||||
| Federal Court / Federal Circuit Court coverage | ||||
| Join Personal FREE | Join Premium Starter FREE | Go to Austlii | Go to Court Data Australia | |
Straightforward pricing. No nasty surprises.
Free
(paid plans coming soon - waitlist below).
Simple sign-up:
-
Fill in the registration form.
-
Join the FREE waitlist below for paid plans – no payment needed today.
-
Verify your email to instantly unlock upgraded search.
Select tab below:
- Free Plans & Comparisons
- Professional, Premium Intelligence & Enterprise Plans
Select an option below:
- Compare FREE & Paid plans
- FREE plans
| Professional Intelligence | Premium Intelligence | Enterprise | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indicative pricing |
299 AUD$ 150 AUD$ 2999 per/mo |
799 AUD$ 499 AUD$ 4999 per/mo |
Alpha - request invite $2.5-15k AUD$ 1999 AUD$ 20,000 per/mo |
| Court List | |||
| All free plan inclusions? | |||
| Search limits - unlimited Profile views, Case views, Watchlist views. |
|||
| Digital Mark J Smith chatbot bot 24x7 multi-lingual chatbot trained on all Mark J Smith's legal knowledge, case law / precedents, Australian legislation and more. Limits apply. NB: Chat sessions can have unlimited questions in each session. |
200 monthly chat streams / sessions (unlimited questions and answers per stream / session) to ask any combination of case law, legislative questions, documentation advice and more. |
600 monthly chat streams / sessions (unlimited questions and answers per stream / session) to ask any combination of case law, legislative questions, documentation advice and more. |
2,000 monthly chat streams / sessions (unlimited questions and answers per stream / session) to ask any combination of case law, legislative questions, documentation advice and more. |
| Watchlisted items follow a case, litigant (either or both) of your choosing (via the Add to Watchlist button) and be notified of future events. Limits apply, still in Alpha. Register for beta access upon release. |
500 case / profile combo |
5,000 case / profile combo |
Unlimited case / profile combo |
| Advanced court list access | |||
| Full (unlocked) case search Instant search, self-service. Includes unlocked: Case Name/s; Case Parties; Add to Watchlist button*; Hearing date specifics - first date, most recent, next date; Case Type; Hearing type; Jurisdiction; Court Name; Court Address / Location; Court Room Number; Judicial Officer's name. |
|||
| Filter by party name (or partial party name) | |||
| Filter by case type | |||
| Filter by hearing type | |||
| Filter by judicial officer | |||
| Filter by date / range | |||
| Filter by court name | |||
| Filter by location | |||
| Filter by jurisdiction | |||
| Access our data via API e.g. hearing data, case data, litigant data, judicial officer data, case outcome / judgment data, LIS score and report data and more. |
|||
| Counter - times page view since count began |
|||
| Counter - times party watchlisted since count began |
|||
| Counter - times case watchlisted since count began |
|||
| Litigant profile - company contacts and more via clickable link |
|||
| Litigant profile enrichment at least monthly via Company enrichment tool, Hubspot Enterprise |
|||
| Filter by litigant postcode future tool planned for 2026 |
upon request |
upon request |
|
| Filter by ANZSIC code future tool planned for 2026 |
upon request |
upon request |
|
| Watchlists & alerts | |||
| Portal access separate log-in to custom private content via dcpartners.solutions/portal |
|||
| Watchlist for cases via dcpartners.solutions/portal |
|||
| Watchlist for litigants (e.g. your creditors) via dcpartners.solutions/portal |
|||
| Watchlist upload via csv | |||
| Watchlisted items | 500 case / profile combo |
5,000 case / profile combo |
Unlimited case / profile combo |
| Intelligence features | |||
| LIS Score (0–100) | |||
| LIS Factor Breakdown ("Why") This is a great place to add a bit of extra information about the feature. |
|||
| LIS Factor export Export LIS Factor report as PDF file (via dcpartners.solutions/portal) |
|||
| LIS Scores via customer portal - single view view all cases followed including scores on a single page? |
|||
| Security & Governance | |||
| Customer portal via dcpartners.solutions/portal - view tickets, invoices, subscription/s, watchlists and more. |
|||
| Self registration | |||
| Password less authentication login via authenication email. Improves the sign in experience for users by giving the choice to register and sign in without a password, providing an email with a one-time magic link to authenticate. |
|||
| Enterprise registration via csv | |||
| Social signon Google / Microsoft credentials |
|||
| SSO sign-on Microsoft Entra & other providers (Okta, OneLogin, Google) - e.g. SAML, x509 certificate etc. Specific requirements discussed during onboarding. |
|||
| Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) Privacy Officer/Auditor Roles |
|||
| Company-Wide Reporting Master Corporate Domain wide Watchlist / Dashboard |
|||
| Internal Conflict Management client side, fully configurable (Individual Only/Admin) depending on client company policy |
|||
| Provider-Blind Mode Contractual Assurance. |
|||
| Other functions | |||
| ASIC search integration additional search fees may apply |
|||
| PPSR search integration additional search fees may apply |
|||
| Property / Title search integration additional search fees may apply |
|||
| Advanced reporting additional fees may apply |
upon request |
upon request |
upon request |
| Custom reporting additional fees may apply |
upon request |
upon request |
upon request |
| Graph based interactive UI Powered by Neo4J. Coming 2026. View: dcpartners.solutions/roadmap |
|||
| AI Legal Consultant/Chatbot Limits apply. |
|||
| Join Waitlist / Start Business Free Plan Join Waitlist / Start Business Free Plan | Join Waitlist / Start Business Free Plan Join Waitlist / Start Business Free Plan | Join Waitlist / Start Business Free Plan Join Waitlist / Start Business Free Plan | |
FAQ's
-
This website has a 1 star rating on Google Reviews, why should I trust you?
Yes, our Google rating reflects a handful of 1-star reviews—almost all from people named in public court records who dislike the publicity. It’s an occupational hazard for anyone publishing factual court data.
Take this recent example (22 October 2025): a Parramatta lawyer, sued by his own former client, demanded we remove his name or face a “nuclear-level” Google review. The court file is clear—the client was plaintiff, the lawyer defendant, no cross-claim. Yet the threat was explicit: delete the record or be punished with a false review claiming we “lied” and “owed money.” (Redacted screenshot attached below for transparency.)
Here’s why that doesn’t shake our credibility:
- 100 % of our data comes from official court daily law lists—publicly posted by the courts themselves since we started monitoring in 2017. No secret sources, no paid leaks.
- Free, same-day corrections. If we ever get a detail wrong, email us and it’s fixed immediately—no charge, no questions. Accuracy is our only asset.
- Satisfaction guarantee. Try any search. If you’re not happy, full refund, no quibbles.
- Eight years and counting. If what we do were unlawful, we’d have been shut down years ago. Instead, Australia’s top law firms, banks, and insurers quietly rely on us—discreetly, because the data is sensitive, not because the service isn’t trusted.
- Published under my real name. I’m Mark James Smith, sole publisher of CourtList.com.au. My reputation is on the line with every record.
Negative reviews are loud; satisfied users are silent. The ultimate proof is in the product. Run a search, verify the court file yourself, and decide. If it’s not valuable, use the guarantee.
Regards, Mark James Smith CourtList.com.au

-
Can I pay you to remove the case from the internet? I suffer from PTSD and seeing my name online is causing me severe stress.
Dear [Name],
I’m truly sorry to hear the listing is adding to your distress—mental health is no small matter.
Unfortunately, we cannot accept payment to delete or hide any record. Every entry on CourtList.com.au is taken verbatim from the court’s own public daily law list. Removing it for money would:
- Breach the open-justice principle upheld by every Australian superior court.
- Expose us to contempt proceedings or ACCC action for misleading conduct.
- Create an unethical “pay-to-suppress” loophole that wealthy litigants could exploit.
What we can do (free, same-day):
- Correct any factual error (wrong case number, misspelled name, etc.).
- Add a short public note if the court has since made a non-publication order—send us the sealed order and we’ll suppress the record instantly.
- Link to your own statement (max 100 words) alongside the entry, e.g. “The matter was resolved by consent on [date]; I received counselling and have moved forward.”
If the stress is acute, I strongly recommend:
- Contacting Lifeline (13 11 14) or Beyond Blue ( be (1300 22 4636) for immediate support.
- Asking your lawyer to apply for a suppression order—courts routinely grant them for genuine safety/mental-health grounds. Once granted, the listing vanishes from our site within hours.
You’re not alone, and the system does allow exceptions—just not via private payment.
Kind regards, Mark James Smith
Publisher, CourtList.com.au
-
Take it down in 7 days or I sue for defamation and privacy breach. I’ll pay $1,000 to avoid the hassle.
Dear [Name],
- No payment will be accepted—it would constitute an illegal attempt to suppress public court records.
- Defamation/privacy claims fail because:
- We republish only what the court itself publishes.
- Truth is a complete defence (Defamation Act 2005, s 25).
- No “private” facts are disclosed—only party names from open dockets.
Next steps we will take (free):
- Verify the listing matches the official court PDF.
- Offer you a 100-word public rebuttal beside the entry.
- Remove instantly if you obtain a valid suppression order.
Litigation threats are common; none have succeeded in eight years because the data is 100 % public. Save your legal fees—apply to the court for suppression if grounds exist.
Regards, Mark James Smith Publisher
-
What is your satisfaction guarantee?
Read the policy here:
-
Do you have a right to publish private information?
Yes and no.
Open justice is a pillar of our legal system, dating back to the 12th century. It provides visibility and accessibility to all, instilling trust in our legal institutions and preventing potential misconduct. Our websites serve as a testament to this principle.
So actually some details a person may consider "private" are actually clearly enshrined as being in the public.
To request correction of our web record go to:
-
What is No Win, No Fee Debt Collection?
-
How does the Risk-Free Service work?
Clients pay only when their debt is successfully collected. There are no upfront costs or financial risks involved - unless clearly quoted and accepted by the client upfront.
Similarly, if we undertaking a savings fee for you as the debtor, negotiating with the creditor (for instance if you want us to negotiate a reduction in your tax payment for instance), we only charge in proportion to the discount obtained.
-
Are the recovery strategies customized for each case?
Absolutely, we tailor our approaches to suit the unique circumstances of each debt, whether it's an individual/sole trader or business debt. This involves you the creditor giving us access to all the necessary supporting documentation up front to access the nature of the debt or dispute and the prospects of success.
-
What is Advanced Skip Tracing?
We use technology, these databases and other sources including crowd sourcing to locate debtors who may have changed their contact information. We also have access to a crowd sourced pool of contacts through this website which is receiving meaningful traffic from unique user visits per day (many of whom know the debtor) including from people who may also know the whereabouts of particular debtor and who do provide us with tip-off information regularly.
-
How does Negotiation Expertise benefit clients?
-
How do you manage conflicts of interest? Do you ever charge a fee for debt collection and creditor negotiations?
We’re completely transparent about what we do—and what we don’t do on the same case. Here’s the plain-English version:
1. CourtList.com.au = Public Court Archive (Neutral)
- We publish only what the courts themselves make public: party names, case numbers, hearing dates.
- We never edit, hide, or favour one side.
- My own case (Newpoint Reinsurance v Mark James Smith) is listed just like anyone else’s.
2. Separate Help Service (Optional, Disclosed, One-Sided Only)
Sometimes people who appear on court lists reach out for help with:
- Collecting money they’re owed
- Negotiating with creditors to save money
- Refinancing or restructuring a struggling business
- Finding litigation funding or a better lawyer
If you ask for this help, here’s how it works:
What We Do What We Never Do Refer you to a trusted external partner (lawyer, funder, debt specialist) Act for both sides of the same dispute Earn a success fee only if you win or save money Take upfront fees just to make a referral Disclose in writing any fee we’ll earn — before you agree Work against someone whose case is on our site Example:
“Mark, I’m the plaintiff in a $200k debt case. Can you help me collect?” → We connect you with a specialist collector. → If they recover your money, they take their cut, and we get a pre-agreed success fee (e.g. 5%). → We do NOT help the debtor in the same case.
3. Why This Started (Our Roots)
- In 2017, we were business consultants doing coaching, litigation funding, and debt recovery.
- We built CourtList to spot opportunities and help clients early.
- Today, the site gets thousands of visitors weekly—too many for us to help one-on-one.
- So we built a vetted partner network to scale support safely.
4. Conflict Firewall – Simple Rule
We only ever help one side of a dispute — and we tell you upfront if we stand to earn a fee.
- If you’re a creditor, we won’t help the debtor.
- If you’re a debtor, we won’t help the creditor.
- If we can’t help without a conflict, we say no — or refer you to someone independent.
5. Litigation Funding (Rare, Fully Disclosed)
- Occasionally, we (or a partner) fund strong cases.
- You’ll get a clear funding agreement upfront: “We cover costs; we get X% if you win.”
- We never fund the opponent in the same matter.
Bottom Line
- CourtList = public truth, no bias.
- Help service = optional, one-sided, success-based, fully disclosed.
- No double-dipping. Ever.
If you're in a case and need support, just ask — we’ll tell you straight:
✅ “Yes, we can help — here’s who, here’s the cost if you win.”
❌ “No conflict — we can’t take this one.”
Regards, Mark James Smith
Publisher, CourtList.com.au mark@courtlist.com.au
-
Why are you breaching my privacy (the litigant) by publishing historical information about my case?
First off, we're not breaching your privacy—far from it. Court proceedings in Australia, including those in the Federal Court, are fundamentally public by design under the principle of open justice. This means that details like party names, case numbers, and hearing dates from official court lists are published openly by the courts themselves to ensure transparency and accountability in the justice system. We simply aggregate and archive that same public data; we don't access sealed files, private documents, or anything beyond what's already out there for anyone to see.
To put it plainly: If it's on the Federal Court's daily list or public docket, it's fair game for reporting. Historical cases stay listed because they form a vital record—removing them retroactively would undermine the very transparency the courts uphold. (And yes, even my own ongoing matter—Newpoint Reinsurance Company Limited v Mark James Smith (NSD 887/2024)—is fully listed on our site. No one's exempt, including the publisher. That's consistency, not hypocrisy.)
Why We Publish Court Lists
CourtList.com.au exists to make this public information more accessible. Since 2017, we've monitored daily court lists from federal, state, and territory courts across Australia, pulling in data on civil, criminal, and family matters (where public). Our goal? Democratize access to the justice system. Not everyone has the time, tools, or know-how to sift through court websites or visit registries in person. We provide a searchable archive so businesses, journalists, researchers, and everyday people can quickly verify if someone (or a company) has a litigation history—without the hassle.
Think of it like a public records index: We don't judge, sensationalize, or add commentary. It's raw, factual data to help users make informed decisions, whether that's a lender checking a borrower's disputes or a family vetting a new partner.
Why It's in the Public Interest
Open access to court lists serves the broader good in several key ways:
- Transparency and Accountability: Courts aren't secret clubs. Publishing who's involved—who's suing, being sued, or facing charges—holds powerful players (corporations, officials, individuals) to account. It prevents hidden patterns of abuse, like serial litigants clogging the system or companies dodging debts through endless appeals. The High Court has long affirmed this: "The application of the open justice principle... is a matter of public interest" (Attorney-General (NSW) v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1260).
- Informed Decision-Making: In a connected world, people rely on each other—hiring, lending, partnering. Knowing someone's court history (e.g., a history of unpaid judgments) protects the public from risks. Banks use it for due diligence; journalists for stories on systemic issues like family violence trends or corporate fraud. Without it, we'd be flying blind.
- Deterrence and Efficiency: Public visibility discourages frivolous claims and encourages settlements. It also helps courts manage caseloads by spotlighting repeat players. Studies from the Australian Law Reform Commission show that access to court data reduces overall litigation costs for society by promoting early resolutions.
- No Privacy Invasion—It's Selective Transparency: Personal privacy matters, but it's balanced against public interest. That's why courts redact sensitive details (e.g., kids' names in family cases) before publishing lists. Historical data stays public because erasing it would rewrite history—imagine airbrushing a CEO's past fraud conviction from the record, Prince Andrew's involvement at Epstein Island or Donald Trump's public past? If a case is truly private (e.g., suppressed by order), it never hits our site. In the meantime no one is above the law - that's the principle that the Rule of Law protects with open justice being a core element for about 800 years.
In short, we're not "breaching" anything; we're amplifying what's already public for the collective benefit. If our listing of your case feels intrusive, that's the raw edge of open justice—uncomfortable for some, essential for all. You're welcome to request a correction if any fact is off (we fix errors same-day, free), or use our satisfaction guarantee for a refund if a search doesn't meet your needs.
If you'd like to discuss suppression orders, data removal (where legally possible), or how to navigate your Federal Court matter, just reply—I'm here.
Regards, Mark James Smith
Publisher, CourtList.com.au
Email: mark@courlist.com.au
-
It’s an old case from about 10 years ago?
Hello,
Age doesn’t erase public record status. Once a case appears on a court’s daily list, it remains part of the permanent public archive—just like ASIC company searches or land-title records.
We cannot delete it for payment, but here are three free, lawful options:
Option How it works Timeframe Court suppression order Apply under relevant legislation; send us the sealed order. Same-day removal Free annotation Add “Case finalised 2016 – no orders against me” 24 h Factual correction If any detail is wrong (e.g. wrong party name) Immediate Historical data actually helps most users: it shows the matter is long resolved, not current.
Happy to add your clarification note—just reply with the text.
Best, Mark
-
Are legal references from Digital Mark J Smith legal advice, can I rely on it?
No — it is not legal advice, and you must not rely on it alone for any decision.
Plain English:
1. What “Digital Mark J Smith” Is
- A fast, JD-trained chatbot that scans:
- Every public Australian case & statute
- My (Mark James Smith’s) University of Sydney JD notes + 15 years funding 100+ real disputes
- Answers general questions in seconds: “What’s a freezing order?” → “Mareva injunction – s 23 Federal Court Act – stops assets leaving before judgment.”*
2. What It Is Not
❌ Never Legal advice I’m not admitted (stepped back from being admitted after a heart attack many years ago) Your lawyer No file, no duty to you, no privilege Final word AI can hallucinate; facts win cases
3. My Background
- JD, University of Sydney – same legal education as top barristers
- Litigation funder – backed winners, spotted losers
- Today: Run CourtList, blog, fund the occasional slam-dunk case
- Not practising law – no current practising certificate, no advice you can take to the bank.
4. Mandatory Disclaimer (Every Reply)
⚠️ General info only — not legal advice. Check with your own admitted lawyer.
5. Safe Use Guide
✅ Do ❌ Don’t Learn fast File based only on bot Print → give your lawyer Skip solicitor review Ask: “Cite the case?” Assume 100 % fit
6. Example
Bot: “Suppression possible – s 37AF FCA; mental health = valid ground (Hogan v Hinch [2011]).” ✅ Perfect starter – hand to your lawyer. ❌ Not the application.
7. Why Pay for CourtList.com.au Instead of ChatGPT or Your Lawyer?
Option Cost Speed Depth Reality Check ChatGPT Free 10 sec Shallow, often wrong citations No Australian court lists, no daily updates Your lawyer $400–$800/hr Days Gold standard Most can’t afford 15 mins CourtList + Digital Mark $49–$199/month Instant 2017–today, every court, searchable Steers you to the right lawyer question Real Barriers to Justice
- Court websites: Clunky, PDF-only, no search, vanish after 30 days.
- Lawyer first call: $500 just to hear your story.
- Average Australian: Can’t pay $5k to “find out if I have a case.”
CourtList Fixes This
You Get Why It Beats Alternatives 8-year archive ChatGPT has zero daily lists Exact party names Google misses 90 % $49/month < 1 lawyer hour Bot steers you “Ask your lawyer about s 37AF suppression” → saves $1k in research Bottom line: Digital Mark J Smith = GPS for the legal maze. Shows the path, flags the potholes — but your admitted lawyer still drives.
Need a bot answer checked? Email mark@courtlist.com.au — I’ll confirm accuracy in general, then push you to your solicitor.
Regards,
Mark James Smith JD (USyd) | Litigation Funder | Publisher, CourtList.com.au
Not admitted · Not giving legal advice
- A fast, JD-trained chatbot that scans:
-
How long does it take for the profile to go live?
-
How anonymous is the information provided?
Mark Smith, in this particular context, is a reputable Blogger and accomplished journalist complete with a legal education from the University of Sydney - one of Australia's best Universities.
The law in NSW provides utmost protection to those invaluable sources and informants who play a vital role in, in this context, the world of journalism.
To explore the legal safeguards in detail, kindly click on the following link:
Evidence Act - Journalist Privilege.
Furthermore, to gain a comprehensive understanding of Mark's unwavering dedication towards journalistic principles, we invite you to peruse our policy, readily available in the footer or via this link.
-
Who makes up the Professional Debt Recovery Team?
Our team consists of experienced business debt collectors supervised by Mark Smith from around Australia each of whom is well-versed in both the legal and ethical aspects of debt collection. The team member selected may be Mark himself or another competent professional.
Mark has taken on some of the toughest debt collection tasks in the world including Steve Papermaster.
-
Is the service legally compliant?
-
Do you report unpaid debts to credit bureaus?
-
What happens if legal action is needed for a debt?
-
More FAQ's
Any other thoughts ... send us an instant chat - bottom right corner or complete the form below:
-
Your site stopped me getting a job last week. The recruiter Googled me and saw the old case. I’ll pay whatever it takes to delete it.
Hi [Name],
I understand how frustrating that must feel—background checks can be brutal.
Short answer: we cannot take money to remove public court data. Doing so would be illegal, unfair to other litigants, and would collapse the entire open-justice framework.
What actually happened (and what you can do):
- The recruiter saw a public Federal/State court record, not “our” invention.
- You can counter the narrative by:
- Sending the recruiter the final judgment or settlement (proving resolution).
- Adding a free 100-word note on our site (e.g. “Case NSD123/2020 was discontinued without admission; I have a clean employment history since 2021.”).
- Asking the court for a non-publication order if the matter meets s 37AF criteria (mental health, safety, etc.).
Pro tip for job applications: Include a short cover-note: “A historical court listing may appear online; the matter was resolved [X years] ago with no adverse finding.” Most employers value transparency over secrecy.
We’re here to correct errors or add your statement—free, within 24 h.
Regards, Mark James Smith
Businesses already using courtlist.com.au:






